PUBLICATIONS

Evaluating State and Local Business Tax Incentives (with Owen Zidar) Journal of Economic Perspectives 34(2) Spring 2020. Slides. Featured in: Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Governing.

Corporate Political Spending and State Tax Policy: Evidence from Citizens United (with Alisa Tazhitdinova and Sarah Robinson) Journal of Public Economics 221 May 2023. Publisher’s Link. Featured in: Wall Street Journal, Harvard Law School Forum.

Bidding for Firms: Subsidy Competition in the U.S. Forthcoming at the Journal of Political Economy Awards: National Tax Association Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation in Government Finance and Taxation, International Industrial Organization Conference Best Rising Star Paper, University of Virginia Outstanding Dissertation. Data: Dataverse. Data Appendix.

WORKING PAPERS

The Political Economy of Subsidy-Giving Abstract: Politicians regularly offer large discretionary subsidies to attract firms to their jurisdictions. In this paper I quantify the political benefit of this subsidy-giving by combining hand-collected subsidy data, county level election returns, and an original survey of voters. Subsidy-giving generates a 2ppt increase in vote share for incumbent governors in the winning county. I use the survey estimates to inform bounds on a state-level effect, and I find that observed subsidy-giving is pivotal for 12% of the elections in the sample. I show that this effect is not due to realized job creation. Instead, the salience of firm attraction drives electoral rewards.

Consolidation and Political Influence in the Auto Retail Industry (with Sarah Moshary) Abstract: This paper provides novel empirical evidence on the causal link between consolidation and political influence. Focusing on the auto retail industry, we show that mergers lead to higher levels of industry lobbying, on the order of +70%. This increase is driven by mergers that resolve the collective action problem, leading firms to internalize a greater share of lobbying benefits. Further, this lobbying translates into more favorable legislation for the industry; we estimate a 7ppt increase in enactment probability for bills that car dealers support. Our findings underscore the distinction between concentration and size in economic models of lobbying.

Legislation, Regulation and Litigation: Demand for U.S. Legal Services in Historical Perspective (with Ariell Reshef) [New! 2/25] Abstract: The employment share of legal services in the U.S. more than doubled during 1970--1990, in stark contrast to stability during 1850--1970 and after 1990. The relative wage of lawyers and law firm partners also doubled between 1970 and 1990. We argue that this demand shift was driven by important legislative and regulatory events, starting in the mid-1960s and lasting throughout the 1980s. These changes increased the scope of the law and uncertainty over legal outcomes. Consistent with this, we find that employment and compensation of lawyers are tightly correlated with federal regulation, fee-shifting statues and civil litigation, over a period of 100 years. These findings are supported by state-level and individual-level analysis. Other factors, e.g., changes in lawyers' quality, industrial composition and technology are not important determinants of the demand shift. We calculate that 40% of payments to legal services in 1990 are in excess of what they would have been had their relative income remained at 1970 levels. This represents an excess cost of 75 billion dollars in 2024 alone.

Procurement and Infrastructure Costs (with Zachary Liscow and William Nober) [Updated! 2/25] Abstract: Why is building and maintaining infrastructure so expensive in the United States? We collect new project-level data on infrastructure spending and new survey data on how the states procure these projects. This allows us to document variation in costs between states, and then correlate these costs with potential cost drivers. We find that two important inputs in the procurement process appear to particularly drive costs: (1) the capacity of the DOT procuring the project and (2) the lack of competition in the market for government construction contracts. We quantify the role of capacity with administrative data that links individual personnel with infrastructure contracts in California. We show that higher quality engineers deliver projects at a lower cost, while retirement shocks slow project timelines and increase costs. Survey with responses.

Works in Progress

The Distributional Effects of Million Dollar Plants (with Ben Hyman, Moises Yi, and Owen Zidar)

Tax Discrimination: Competition in the Market for Firms (with Mathilde Muñoz)